Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2776 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2 +17815%
5.733 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
44
Compute Units
2
2816
Shading Units
40
176
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
RV620
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
32W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy