Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD FirePro S9000

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD FirePro S9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2 +77%
5.733 TFLOPS
FirePro S9000
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Aug 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
44
Compute Units
28
2816
Shading Units
1792
176
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
Tahiti
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy