Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD FirePro W4100

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD FirePro W4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2 +788%
5.733 TFLOPS
FirePro W4100
0.645 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Aug 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
512
176
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.08 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
645.1 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.32 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
50W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy