Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
2576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
Lower TDP (236W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2 +821%
5.733 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Jun 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
512bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
2816
Shading Units
240
176
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
236W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
GT200
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy