AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (275W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5.733 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY
+25%
7.168 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Jul 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
3584
176
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
224.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.168 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.168 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
448.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
275W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
Fiji
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Fiji PRO CB
(215-0862046)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3
