Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 's Advantages
Lower TDP (29W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 360 OEM +933%
1.613 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 520
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2011
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
768
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
29W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
GF119
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
GF119-300-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy