Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 360 OEM +127%
1.613 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Dec 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
768
Shading Units
240
48
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
204W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
GT200B
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy