Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs NVIDIA NVS 300

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 360 OEM +4035%
1.613 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2011
Pirate Islands
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

85W
TDP
18W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
GT218
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy