Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 57% (1650MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 360 OEM
1.613 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300 +161%
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2020
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
20
768
Shading Units
1280
48
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
Navi 14
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Board Design

85W
TDP
85W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy