Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 290

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (85W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 360 OEM
1.613 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290 +200%
4.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2013
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
Hawaii
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy