Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (1425MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 360 OEM +47%
1.613 TFLOPS
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
May 2021
Pirate Islands
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
TU117
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy