Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM vs ATI FirePro V5700

AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM vs ATI FirePro V5700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380 OEM and 512MB VRAM FirePro V5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V5700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (56W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 380 OEM +634%
3.29 TFLOPS
FirePro V5700
0.448 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
320
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
448.0 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
56W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Antigua
GPU Name
RV730
Antigua PRO (215-0877000)
GPU Variant
RV730 XT (215-0719047)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy