Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM vs AMD FirePro W4300

AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380 OEM and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 380 OEM +130%
3.29 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Dec 2015
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
12
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Antigua
GPU Name
Bonaire
Antigua PRO (215-0877000)
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy