Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 380X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R9 380X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380X and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 380X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (182.4GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 380X +732%
3.973 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Jul 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
182.4GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2048
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
124.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
3.973 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.973 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
248.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Antigua
GPU Name
GT200B
Antigua XT (215-0877016)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B3
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy