Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 380X vs ATI Radeon X1600

AMD Radeon R9 380X vs ATI Radeon X1600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380X and 512MB VRAM Radeon X1600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 380X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (182.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (27W vs 190W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Jan 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
182.4GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

31.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
124.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
3.973 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.973 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
248.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Antigua
GPU Name
RV516
Antigua XT (215-0877016)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
27W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy