Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 390 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon R9 390 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 390 and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 390 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 275W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jan 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
40
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
-
160
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
160.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.120 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Grenada
GPU Name
RV380
Grenada PRO (215-0880030)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy