Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 390 vs AMD FirePro W4000

AMD Radeon R9 390 vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 390 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 390 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 390 +304%
5.12 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Aug 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
768
160
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
160.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.120 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Grenada
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Grenada PRO (215-0880030)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy