Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 390X vs ATI FirePro V3750

AMD Radeon R9 390X vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 390X and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 390X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 390X +1580%
5.914 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Sep 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
320
176
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
184.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.914 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
739.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
48W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Grenada
GPU Name
RV730
Grenada XT (215-0880004)
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy