Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 390X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R9 390X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 390X and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 390X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2600 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 390X +1003%
5.914 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Nov 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
448bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
2816
Shading Units
216
176
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
184.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.914 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
739.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
171W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Grenada
GPU Name
GT200B
Grenada XT (215-0880004)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy