CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
VS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3544 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY
+16966%
7.168 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
0.042 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY
VS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
Graphics Card
Jul 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
56
Compute Units
2
3584
Shading Units
40
224
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
224.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
7.168 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.168 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
RV610
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GPU Variant
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²
Board Design
275W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY
2
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY
4
Intel Arc A380 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY
5
NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY
6
AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
7
AMD Radeon HD 7450 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY
8
AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
9
AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE
10
AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD Radeon R7 260X
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy