Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (275W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY +110%
7.168 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Nov 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
1792
224
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
224.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
7.168 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.168 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
375W
600 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Tahiti
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy