Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY +18279%
7.168 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Apr 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
3584
Shading Units
16
224
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
224.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
7.168 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.168 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
40W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GT218
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy