Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (275W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY +1102%
7.168 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2015
Release Date
Jan 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
3584
Shading Units
240
224
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
224.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
7.168 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.168 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
289W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GT200B
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy