CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
VS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (275W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY
+1102%
7.168 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY
VS
GeForce GTX 295
Graphics Card
Jul 2015
Release Date
Jan 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
3584
Shading Units
240
224
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
224.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
7.168 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.168 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Board Design
275W
TDP
289W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
GT200B
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD Radeon Sky 700
2
AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
3
AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 PCIe x1
4
AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA T600
5
AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs ATI FirePro V7800
6
AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs ATI Radeon HD 4830
7
AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
8
AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD FirePro W8100
9
AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs AMD Radeon R9 270
10
AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Related News
1
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
2
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
3
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
4
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
5
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
6
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
7
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
8
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
9
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
10
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy