AMD Radeon R9 FURY vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY and 32MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 32 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 275W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jul 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Pirate Islands
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
32MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s
Render Config
56
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
2
64
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
224.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
7.168 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.168 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
448.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
275W
TDP
15W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
VSA-101
Fiji PRO CB
(215-0862046)
GPU Variant
Daytona
(355-0025-221)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
180 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
-
