Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FireGL V5600

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FireGL V5600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
3976 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +4380%
8.602 TFLOPS
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Aug 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR4
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
120
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
89W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
RV630
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy