CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V3750
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V3750
VS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
ATI FirePro V3750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X
+2343%
8.602 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X
VS
FirePro V3750
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Sep 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
4
4096
Shading Units
320
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
RV730
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Board Design
275W
TDP
48W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V8800
2
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition
3
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 4730
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
5
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
7
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 6400
8
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
9
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE
10
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy