Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V3750

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +2343%
8.602 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Sep 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
4
4096
Shading Units
320
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
RV730
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
48W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy