Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V7900

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +363%
8.602 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
May 2011
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1280
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Cayman
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy