Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 640GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3984 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +3097%
8.602 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Nov 2007
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
640MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
320bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
4096
Shading Units
112
256
TMUs
28
64
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
G80
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy