CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
VS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
4032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X
+4035%
8.602 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 140 OEM
0.208 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X
VS
GeForce GT 140 OEM
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Mar 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
8
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
64
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
208.0 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
G94B
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Board Design
275W
TDP
105W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition
2
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V8800
3
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 4730
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
5
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
7
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
8
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
9
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA NVS 315
10
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon HD 8860 OEM
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy