AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

VS

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)

3200 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 10 months late

Boost Clock1590MHz

Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 FURY X +201%

8.602 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

2.849 TFLOPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 FURY X +114%

30

GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

14

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 FURY X +124%

65

GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

29

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 FURY X +81%

80

GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

44

Radeon R9 FURY X

VS

GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

Graphics Card

Jun 2015

Release Date

Apr 2020

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 16

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1410 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1590 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

4GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6

4096bit

Memory Bus

128bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

192.0GB/s

Render Config

64

Compute Units

-

SM Count

14

4096

Shading Units

896

256

TMUs

56

64

ROPs

32

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

50.88 GPixel/s

268.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

89.04 GTexel/s

8.602 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

5.699 TFLOPS

8.602 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.849 TFLOPS

537.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W

TDP

75W

600 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

TU117

Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)

GPU Variant

TU117-300-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

12 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

4.7 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.3

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM

2

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

3

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 3830

4

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

5

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

6

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP

7

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

8

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R9 390

9

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 3450 PCI

10

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 7700

Related News

1

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

2

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

3

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

4

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

5

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

6

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

7

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

8

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

9

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

10

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!