AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

VS

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages

Lower TDP (275W vs 350W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 7 months late

Boost Clock1710MHz

More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (912.4GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)

4864 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 FURY X

8.602 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB +256%

30.64 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 FURY X

5173

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB +263%

18801

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 FURY X

30

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB +193%

88

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 FURY X

65

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB +132%

151

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 FURY X

80

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB +138%

191

Radeon R9 FURY X

VS

GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB

Graphics Card

Jun 2015

Release Date

Jan 2022

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 30

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1260 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1710 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1188 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

12GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6X

4096bit

Memory Bus

384bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

912.4GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

70

64

Compute Units

-

4096

Shading Units

8960

256

TMUs

280

64

ROPs

96

-

Tensor Cores

280

-

RT Cores

70

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

5 MB

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

164.2 GPixel/s

268.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

478.8 GTexel/s

8.602 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

30.64 TFLOPS

8.602 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

30.64 TFLOPS

537.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

478.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

GA102

Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)

GPU Variant

GA102-220-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Ampere

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

28 nm

Process Size

8 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

28.3 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

628 mm²

Board Design

275W

TDP

350W

600 W

Suggested PSU

750 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 12-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

8.6

6.3

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q

2

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti

3

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM

4

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

5

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 4520

6

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM

7

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD FirePro W5000

8

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 3730

9

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS

10

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance