AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

VS

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages

Lower TDP (275W vs 320W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER 's Advantages

Released 8 years and 7 months late

Boost Clock2550MHz

More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (736.3GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)

6144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 FURY X

8.602 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +507%

52.22 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 FURY X

5173

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +449%

28418

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 FURY X

30

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +360%

138

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 FURY X

65

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +290%

254

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 FURY X

80

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER +275%

300

Radeon R9 FURY X

VS

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Graphics Card

Jun 2015

Release Date

Jan 2024

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 40

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

2295 MHz

-

Boost Clock

2550 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1438 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

16GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR6X

4096bit

Memory Bus

256bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

736.3GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

80

64

Compute Units

-

4096

Shading Units

10240

256

TMUs

320

64

ROPs

112

-

Tensor Cores

320

-

RT Cores

80

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

64 MB

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

285.6 GPixel/s

268.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

816.0 GTexel/s

8.602 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

52.22 TFLOPS

8.602 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

52.22 TFLOPS

537.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

816.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

AD103

Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)

GPU Variant

AD103-400-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

5 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

45.9 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

379 mm²

Board Design

275W

TDP

320W

600 W

Suggested PSU

700 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

8.9

6.3

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q

2

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM

3

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti

4

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

5

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

6

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

7

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 4520

8

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

9

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM

10

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

Related News

1

Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory

2

AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2

3

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

4

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs

5

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion

6

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

7

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

8

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

9

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

10

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation