Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R7 260

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R7 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +460%
8.602 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 260
1.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Dec 2013
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.00 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.00 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.536 TFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
95W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Bonaire
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy