AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal

VS

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 480.4GB/s)

512 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock1531MHz

More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)

Lower TDP (250W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon R9 FURY X

8.602 TFLOPS

TITAN X Pascal +27%

10.97 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Radeon R9 FURY X

5173

TITAN X Pascal +84%

9531

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon R9 FURY X

30

TITAN X Pascal +40%

42

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon R9 FURY X

65

TITAN X Pascal +20%

78

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon R9 FURY X

80

TITAN X Pascal +60%

128

Radeon R9 FURY X

VS

TITAN X Pascal

Graphics Card

Jun 2015

Release Date

Aug 2016

Pirate Islands

Generation

GeForce 10

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1417 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1531 MHz

500 MHz

Memory Clock

1251 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

12GB

HBM

Memory Type

GDDR5X

4096bit

Memory Bus

384bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

480.4GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

28

64

Compute Units

-

4096

Shading Units

3584

256

TMUs

224

64

ROPs

96

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

16 KB (per CU)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

3 MB

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

147.0 GPixel/s

268.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

342.9 GTexel/s

8.602 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

171.5 GFLOPS

8.602 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

10.97 TFLOPS

537.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

342.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji

GPU Name

GP102

Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)

GPU Variant

GP102-400-A1

GCN 3.0

Architecture

Pascal

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

16 nm

8.9 billion

Transistors

11.8 billion

596 mm²

Die Size

471 mm²

Board Design

275W

TDP

250W

600 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.2

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

6.1

6.3

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max Q

2

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti

3

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM

4

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

5

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI Radeon HD 4520

6

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

7

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

8

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition

9

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs NVIDIA T1000 8 GB

10

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs AMD FirePro W2100

Related News

1

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

2

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

3

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

4

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

5

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

6

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

7

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

8

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip

9

AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly

10

NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products