Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M275 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

AMD Radeon R9 M275 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M275 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M275 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M275 +516%
1.184 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 160M
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Mar 2009
Gem System
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
640
Shading Units
64
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
37.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1184 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
74.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
60W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Venus
GPU Name
G94
Venus XTX (216-0846033)
GPU Variant
N10E-GS1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy