Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock975MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +5020%
1.997 TFLOPS
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Jan 2010
Crystal System
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
975 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
16
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.140 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.280 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT218
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
11W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy