Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon E6465

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon E6465

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon E6465 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Boost Clock975MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E6465 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +940%
1.997 TFLOPS
Radeon E6465
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Sep 2015
Crystal System
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
975 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
2
1024
Shading Units
160
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Caicos
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy