Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 460 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (975MHz vs 907MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 81.28GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro 460 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +7%
1.997 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 460
1.858 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Oct 2016
Crystal System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
81.28GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
16
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.51 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.05 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.858 TFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.858 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
116.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Baffin
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
3 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy