Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1250MHz vs 975MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition
1.997 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300M +60%
3.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Nov 2019
Crystal System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
20
1024
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.00 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.400 TFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.200 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Navi 14
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PROA
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
85W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy