Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R7 A260

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R7 A260

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 A260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 A260 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (980MHz vs 975MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +165%
1.997 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A260
0.752 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Jan 2014
Crystal System
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

16
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Topaz
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy