Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 5300M

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 5300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 168.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (80W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon RX 5300M 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1445MHz vs 975MHz)
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition
1.997 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300M +103%
4.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Nov 2019
Crystal System
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
1445 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
22
1024
Shading Units
1408
64
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.24 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
127.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.138 TFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.069 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
254.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Navi 14
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XLM
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
85W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy