Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R9 M290X vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X 's Advantages
Boost Clock900MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X
2.304 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +29%
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
May 2015
Crystal System
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
900 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Neptune
GPU Name
Amethyst
Neptune XT (216-0847000)
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy