CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
VS
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.3GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
+1350%
3.482 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250M
0.24 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
VS
GeForce GTS 250M
Graphics Card
Nov 2014
Release Date
Jun 2009
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1362 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.3GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
12
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
96
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
3.482 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
217.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
GT215
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
N10E-GE-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
28W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
2
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro 575
3
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 6700S
4
AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
5
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 7870M
6
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
7
NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
8
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 7750M
9
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 M365X
10
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 7530M
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy