AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 174.3GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
3.482 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
+40%
4.884 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2014
Release Date
Apr 2019
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1455 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1362 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
174.3GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2048
Shading Units
1536
128
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
76.32 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
152.6 GTexel/s
3.482 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.769 TFLOPS
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.884 TFLOPS
217.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
TU116
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.7
