Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M295X 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M295X +255%
2.961 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
0.833 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Nov 2013
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.680 GPixel/s
92.54 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.72 GTexel/s
2.961 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.961 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
833.3 GFLOPS
185.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GK107
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
GT 755M
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy