Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M295X 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock937MHz
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M295X +146%
2.961 TFLOPS
GeForce MX350
1.199 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Feb 2020
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
747 MHz
-
Boost Clock
937 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
5
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
640
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.99 GPixel/s
92.54 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.98 GTexel/s
2.961 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.74 GFLOPS
2.961 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1199 GFLOPS
185.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.48 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
GP107
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
20W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy