Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M365X vs AMD FirePro W4190M

AMD Radeon R9 M365X vs AMD FirePro W4190M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M365X and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M365X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (925MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 6 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M365X +71%
1.184 TFLOPS
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2015
Gem System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
6
640
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
37.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1184 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
74.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tropo
GPU Name
Opal
Tropo XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy