Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M385 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230

AMD Radeon R9 M385 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M385 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M385 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1531MHz vs 1000MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M385 +128%
1.792 TFLOPS
GeForce MX230
0.784 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Feb 2019
Gem System
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1519 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
14
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
256
56
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.50 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.50 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.25 GFLOPS
1.792 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
783.9 GFLOPS
112.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.50 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Strato
GPU Name
GP108
Strato XT
GPU Variant
N17S-G0-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
10W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy