Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M385X vs AMD Radeon R7 A260

AMD Radeon R9 M385X vs AMD Radeon R7 A260

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M385X and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 A260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M385X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1100MHz vs 980MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M385X +162%
1.971 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A260
0.752 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2014
Gem System
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
6
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Strato
GPU Name
Topaz
Strato XT
GPU Variant
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy