Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M385X vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R9 M385X vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M385X and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M385X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1100MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M385X
1.971 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +51%
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
May 2015
Gem System
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
28
896
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Strato
GPU Name
Amethyst
Strato XT
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
5 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy